Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for Rec-Gq | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rec-Gq participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning | 77 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning, PKC, PLA2, PLCbeta, Ras, Gq, MAPK, EGFR, Sos, PLC_g, CaMKII, CaM, PP1, PP2B, PKA, AC, MKP3, PKM |
| This model is based on Ajay SM, Bhalla US. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2671-80. This is the feedforward model with MPK3 from figure 8a. | |||
Rec-Gq acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered | |
| Rec-Gq | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Gq Pathway No. : 334 | 0 | 1.5 | No | |
| Fraction of Rec-Gq is 44% of rec, from Fay et al. Since this is not the same receptor, this value is a bit doubtful. Still, we adjust the rate consts in Rec-bind-Gq to match. | ||||||
Rec-Gq acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | |
| 1 | Glu-bind-Rec-Gq | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Gq Pathway No. : 334 | 16.8003 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.006(uM) | - | Substrate Glu Rec-Gq Product Rec-Glu-Gq |
| From Fay et al kb3 = kb = 1.06e-3 which is rather slow. k+1 = kf = 2.8e7 /M/sec= 4.67e-5/sec use 5e-5. However, the Kd from Martin et al may be more appropriate, as this is Glu not the system from Fay. kf = 2.8e-5, kb = 10 Let us compromise. since we have the Fay model, keep kf = k+1 = 2.8e-5. But kb (k-3) is .01 * k-1 from Fay. Scaling by .01, kb = .01 * 10 = 0.1 | ||||||||
| 2 | q | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Gq Pathway No. : 334 | 60.0003 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.01 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.0002(uM) | - | Substrate Rec-Gq mGluRAntag Product Blocked-rec-Gq |
| The rate consts give a total binding affinity of only | ||||||||
Rec-Gq acting as a Product in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
| Rec-bind-Gq | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Gq Pathway No. : 334 | 0.6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 1.6667(uM) | - | Substrate G-GDP mGluR Product Rec-Gq |
| Lets try out the same kinetics as the Rec-Glu-bind-Gq This is much too forward. We know that the steady-state amount of Rec-Gq should be 40% of the total amount of receptor. This is for a different receptor, still we can try to match the value. kf = 1e-6 and kb = 1 give 0.333:0.8 which is pretty close. | |||||||
color.