Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for Sos* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sos* participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
2004_PKM_Tuning | 76 | Network | PKC, Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_tuning, PLA2, PLCbeta, Gq, MAPK, Ras, EGFR, Sos, PLC_g, CaMKII, CaM, PP1, PP2B, PKA, AC, PKM |
| This model is taken from the Ajay SM, Bhalla US. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2671-80. This is the reference feedforward model from Figure 8a. | |||
Sos* acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_Tuning Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered |
| Sos* | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | Sos Pathway No. : 320 | 0 | 1.5 | No |
Sos* acting as a Product of an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_Tuning Network
| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents |
| MAPK* / phosph_Sos | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2004_PKM_tuning Pathway No. : 312 | 2.56406 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate Sos Product Sos* |
| See Porfiri and McCormick JBC 271:10 pp5871 1996 for the existence of this step. We'll take the rates from the ones used for the phosph of Raf by MAPK. Sep 17 1997: The transient activation curve matches better with k1 up by 10 x. | |||||||
Sos* acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_Tuning Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | |
| 1 | Grb2_bind_Sos* | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | Sos Pathway No. : 320 | 0.025 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.0168 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.672(uM) | - | Substrate Grb2 Sos* Product Sos*.Grb2 |
| Same rates as Grb2_bind_Sos: Porfiri and McCormick JBC 271:10 pp 5871 1996 show that the binding is not affected by the phosph. | ||||||||
| 2 | dephosph_Sos | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | Sos Pathway No. : 320 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate Sos* Product Sos |
| The only clue I have to these rates is from the time courses of the EGF activation, which is around 1 to 5 min. The dephosph would be expected to be of the same order, perhaps a bit longer. Lets use 0.002 which is about 8 min. Sep 17: The transient activation curve matches better with kf = 0.001 | ||||||||
color.