| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
1 | CaM_dash_Ca3_ dash_bind_dash_ Ca | CaMKIV_submodel Accession No. : 93 | kinetics Pathway No. : 1110 | 0.465 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 10 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 21.5051(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM_dash_Ca3
Product CaM_dash_Ca4
|
| Use K3 = 21.5 uM here from Stemmer and Klee table 3. kb/kf =21.5 * 6e5 so kf = 7.75e-7, kb = 10 |
2 | CaM_dash_bind_ dash_Ca | CaMKIV_submodel Accession No. : 93 | kinetics Pathway No. : 1110 | 8.4846 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 8.4853 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 1.0001(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM
Product CaM_dash_Ca
|
| Lets use the fast rate consts here. Since the rates are so different, I am not sure whether the order is relevant. These correspond to the TR2C fragment. We use the Martin et al rates here, plus the Drabicowski binding consts. All are scaled by 3X to cell temp. kf = 2e-10 kb = 72 Stemmer & Klee: K1=.9, K2=1.1. Assume 1.0uM for both. kb/kf=3.6e11. If kb=72, kf = 2e-10 (Exactly the same !) 19 May 2006. Splitting the old CaM-TR2-bind-Ca reaction into two steps, each binding 1 Ca. This improves numerical stability and is conceptually better too. Overall rates are the same, so each kf and kb is the square root of the earlier ones. So kf = 1.125e-4, kb = 8.4853 |
3 | CaM_dash_Ca2_ dash_bind_dash_ Ca | CaMKIV_submodel Accession No. : 93 | kinetics Pathway No. : 1110 | 3.6001 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 10 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 2.7777(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM_dash_Ca2
Product CaM_dash_Ca3
|
| K3 = 21.5, K4 = 2.8. Assuming that the K4 step happens first, we get kb/kf = 2.8 uM = 1.68e6 so kf =6e-6 assuming kb = 10 |
4 | CaM_dash_Ca_ dash_bind_dash_ Ca | CaMKIV_submodel Accession No. : 93 | kinetics Pathway No. : 1110 | 8.4846 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 8.4853 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 1.0001(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM_dash_Ca
Product CaM_dash_Ca2
|
| Lets use the fast rate consts here. Since the rates are so different, I am not sure whether the order is relevant. These correspond to the TR2C fragment. We use the Martin et al rates here, plus the Drabicowski binding consts. All are scaled by 3X to cell temp. kf = 2e-10 kb = 72 Stemmer & Klee: K1=.9, K2=1.1. Assume 1.0uM for both. kb/kf=3.6e11. If kb=72, kf = 2e-10 (Exactly the same !) 19 May 2006. Splitting the old CaM-TR2-bind-Ca reaction into two steps, each binding 1 Ca. This improves numerical stability and is conceptually better too. Overall rates are the same, so each kf and kb is the square root of the earlier ones. So kf = 1.125e-4, kb = 8.4853 |