Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for Sos* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sos* participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
-fig1c | 35 | Network | Shared_Object_MAPK-bistability-fig1c, Sos, PKC, MAPK, PLA2, Ras, PDGFR |
| Model for figure 1c in Bhalla US et al. Science (2002) 297(5583):1018-23. The demo for this figure is available here. This synaptic signaling model is without the MKP-1 feedback, so it is bistable and remains so over long periods. | |||
Sos* acting as a Molecule in MAPK-bistability-fig1c Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered | |
| Sos* | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0 | 1000 | No | |
| Phosphorylated form of SoS. Nominally this is an inactivation step mediated by MAPK, see Profiri and McCormick 1996 JBC 271(10):5871. I have not put this inactivation in this pathway so this molecule currently only represents a potential interaction point. | ||||||
Sos* acting as a Substrate in a reaction in MAPK-bistability-fig1c Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | |
| 1 | Grb2_bind_Sos* | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0.025 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.0168 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.672(uM) | - | Substrate Grb2 Sos* Product Sos*.Grb2 |
| Same rates as Grb2_bind_Sos: Porfiri and McCormick JBC 271:10 pp 5871 1996 show that the binding is not affected by the phosphorylation. | ||||||||
| 2 | dephosph_Sos | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate Sos* Product Sos |
| The best clue I have to these rates is from the time courses of the EGF activation, which is around 1 to 5 min. The dephosph would be expected to be of the same order, perhaps a bit longer. Lets use 0.002 which is about 8 min. Sep 17: The transient activation curve matches better with kf = 0.001 | ||||||||
color.