Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for PIP2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PIP2 participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
2004_PKM_Tuning | 76 | Network | PKC, Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_tuning, PLA2, PLCbeta, Gq, MAPK, Ras, EGFR, Sos, PLC_g, CaMKII, CaM, PP1, PP2B, PKA, AC, PKM |
| This model is taken from the Ajay SM, Bhalla US. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2671-80. This is the reference feedforward model from Figure 8a. | |||
PIP2 acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_Tuning Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered |
| PIP2 | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2004_PKM_tuning Pathway No. : 312 | 10 | 1.5 | Yes |
PIP2 acting as a Substrate for an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_Tuning Network
| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | |
| 1 | PLC-Ca / PLC-Ca | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | PLCbeta Pathway No. : 315 | 19.8413 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate PIP2 Product DAG IP3 |
| From Sternweis et al Phil Trans R Soc Lond 1992, also matched by Homma et al. k1 = 1.5e-5, now 4.2e-6 k2 = 70/sec; now 40/sec k3 = 17.5/sec; now 10/sec Note that the wording in Sternweis et al is ambiguous re the Km. | ||||||||
| 2 | PLC-Ca-Gq / PLCb-Ca-Gq | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | PLCbeta Pathway No. : 315 | 5.00003 | 48 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate PIP2 Product DAG IP3 |
| From Sternweis et al, Phil Trans R Soc Lond 1992, and the values from other refs eg Homma et al JBC 263(14) pp6592 1988 match. k1 = 5e-5/sec k2 = 240/sec; now 120/sec k3 = 60/sec; now 30/sec Note that the wording in Sternweis et al is ambiguous wr. to the Km for Gq vs non-Gq states of PLC. K1 is still a bit too low. Raise to 7e-5 9 Jun 1996: k1 was 0.0002, changed to 5e-5 | ||||||||
| 3 | Ca.PLC_g / PIP2_hydrolysis | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | PLC_g Pathway No. : 321 | 97.2222 | 14 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate PIP2 Product DAG IP3 |
| Mainly Homma et al JBC 263:14 1988 pp 6592, but these parms are the Ca-stimulated form. It is not clear whether the enzyme is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation at this point or not. Wahl et al JBC 267:15 10447-10456 1992 say that the Ca_stim and phosph form has 7X higher affinity for substrate than control. This is close to Wahl's figure 7, which I am using as reference. | ||||||||
| 4 | Ca.PLC_g* / PIP2_hydrolysis | 2004_PKM_Tuning Accession No. : 76 | PLC_g Pathway No. : 321 | 19.7917 | 57 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate PIP2 Product DAG IP3 |
| Mainly Homma et al JBC 263:14 1988 pp 6592, but these parms are the Ca-stimulated form. It is not clear whether the enzyme is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation at this point or not. Wahl et al JBC 267:15 10447-10456 1992 say that this has 7X higher affinity for substrate than control. | ||||||||
color.