Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for GTP-Ras | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| GTP-Ras participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning | 77 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning, PKC, PLA2, PLCbeta, Ras, Gq, MAPK, EGFR, Sos, PLC_g, CaMKII, CaM, PP1, PP2B, PKA, AC, MKP3, PKM |
| This model is based on Ajay SM, Bhalla US. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2671-80. This is the feedforward model with MPK3 from figure 8a. | |||
GTP-Ras acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered | |
| GTP-Ras | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 0 | 1.5 | No | |
| Only a very small fraction (7% unstim, 15% stim) of ras is GTP-bound. Gibbs et al JBC 265(33) 20437 | ||||||
GTP-Ras acting as a Substrate for an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents |
| GAP / GAP-inact-ras | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 1.01039 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras Product GDP-Ras |
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | |||||||
GTP-Ras acting as a Product of an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | |
| 1 | GEF-Gprot-bg / GEF-bg_act-ras | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 0.505051 | 0.02 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GDP-Ras Product GTP-Ras |
| Kinetics based on the activation of Gq by the receptor complex in the Gq model (in turn based on the Mahama and Linderman model) k1 = 2e-5, k2 = 1e-10, k3 = 10 (I do not know why they even bother with k2). Lets put k1 at 2e-6 to get a reasonable equilibrium More specific values from, eg.g: Orita et al JBC 268(34) 25542-25546 from rasGRF and smgGDS: k1=3.3e-7; k2 = 0.08, k3 = 0.02 | ||||||||
| 2 | GEF* / GEF*-act-ras | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 0.505051 | 0.02 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GDP-Ras Product GTP-Ras |
| Kinetics same as GEF-bg-act-ras | ||||||||
| 3 | CaM-GEF / CaM-GEF-act-ras | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 0.505051 | 0.02 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GDP-Ras Product GTP-Ras |
| Kinetics same as GEF-bg_act-ras | ||||||||
| 4 | Shc*.Sos.Grb2 / Sos.Ras_GEF | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Pathway No. : 329 | 0.505051 | 0.02 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GDP-Ras Product GTP-Ras |
GTP-Ras acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2004_PKM_MKP3_Tuning Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | |
| 1 | Ras-act-craf | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Pathway No. : 329 | 9.9999 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1* Product Raf*-GTP-Ras |
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. | ||||||||
| 2 | Pase | 2004_PKM_MKP3_ Tuning Accession No. : 77 | Ras Pathway No. : 333 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras Product GDP-Ras |
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 | ||||||||
color.