Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for Ca | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ca participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
2007_PKM | 80 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM |
| This is a non-bistable model of ERKII signaling that also incorporates PKM synthesis triggered by Ca influx. It is a simplified variant of the model of Ajay SM, Bhalla US. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(10):2671-80. | |||
Ca acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered |
| Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_PKM Pathway No. : 369 | 0.08 | 1.5 | No |
Ca acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | |
| 1 | PKC-act-by-Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | PKC Pathway No. : 370 | 0.6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.8333(uM) | - | Substrate Ca PKC-cytosolic Product PKC-Ca |
| Need est of rate of assoc of Ca and PKC. Assume it is fast The original parameter-searched kf of 439.4 has been scaled by 1/6e8 to account for change of units to n. Kf now 8.16e-7, kb=.6085 Raised kf to 1e-6 to match Ca curve, kb to .5 | ||||||||
| 2 | CaM-Ca3-bind-Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | CaM Pathway No. : 373 | 0.465 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 10 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 21.5053(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM-Ca3 Product CaM-Ca4 |
| Use K3 = 21.5 uM here from Stemmer and Klee table 3. kb/kf =21.5 * 6e5 so kf = 7.75e-7, kb = 10 | ||||||||
| 3 | CaM-bind-Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | CaM Pathway No. : 373 | 8.4848 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 8.4853 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 1.0001(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM Product CaM-Ca |
| Lets use the fast rate consts here. Since the rates are so different, I am not sure whether the order is relevant. These correspond to the TR2C fragment. We use the Martin et al rates here, plus the Drabicowski binding consts. All are scaled by 3X to cell temp. kf = 2e-10 kb = 72 Stemmer & Klee: K1=.9, K2=1.1. Assume 1.0uM for both. kb/kf=3.6e11. If kb=72, kf = 2e-10 (Exactly the same !) 19 May 2006. Splitting the old CaM-TR2-bind-Ca reaction into two steps, each binding 1 Ca. This improves numerical stability and is conceptually better too. Overall rates are the same, so each kf and kb is the square root of the earlier ones. So kf = 1.125e-4, kb = 8.4853 | ||||||||
| 4 | CaM-Ca2-bind-Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | CaM Pathway No. : 373 | 3.6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 10 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 2.7778(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM-Ca2 Product CaM-Ca3 |
| K3 = 21.5, K4 = 2.8. Assuming that the K4 step happens first, we get kb/kf = 2.8 uM = 1.68e6 so kf =6e-6 assuming kb = 10 | ||||||||
| 5 | CaM-Ca-bind-Ca | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | CaM Pathway No. : 373 | 8.4848 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 8.4853 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 1.0001(uM) | - | Substrate Ca CaM-Ca Product CaM-Ca2 |
| Lets use the fast rate consts here. Since the rates are so different, I am not sure whether the order is relevant. These correspond to the TR2C fragment. We use the Martin et al rates here, plus the Drabicowski binding consts. All are scaled by 3X to cell temp. kf = 2e-10 kb = 72 Stemmer & Klee: K1=.9, K2=1.1. Assume 1.0uM for both. kb/kf=3.6e11. If kb=72, kf = 2e-10 (Exactly the same !) 19 May 2006. Splitting the old CaM-TR2-bind-Ca reaction into two steps, each binding 1 Ca. This improves numerical stability and is conceptually better too. Overall rates are the same, so each kf and kb is the square root of the earlier ones. So kf = 1.125e-4, kb = 8.4853 | ||||||||
Ca acting as a Product in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
| Ca_diff | 2007_PKM Accession No. : 80 | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_PKM Pathway No. : 369 | 5 (s^-1) | 5 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 0.1sec | Substrate Ca_input Product Ca |
color.