Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for Sos | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sos participated as | Molecule | Sum total of | Enzyme | Substrate of an enzyme | Product of an enzyme | Substrate in Reaction | Product in Reaction |
| No. of occurrences | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Accession and Pathway Details |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link |
-fig1c | 35 | Network | Shared_Object_MAPK-bistability-fig1c, Sos, PKC, MAPK, PLA2, Ras, PDGFR |
| Model for figure 1c in Bhalla US et al. Science (2002) 297(5583):1018-23. The demo for this figure is available here. This synaptic signaling model is without the MKP-1 feedback, so it is bistable and remains so over long periods. | |||
Sos acting as a Molecule in MAPK-bistability-fig1c Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered | |
| Sos | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0.1 | 1000 | No | |
| I have tried using low (0.02 uM) initial concs, but these give a very flat response to EGF stim although the overall activation of Ras is not too bad. I am reverting to 0.1 because we expect a sharp initial response, followed by a decline. | ||||||
Sos acting as a Substrate in a reaction in MAPK-bistability-fig1c Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
| Grb2_bind_Sos | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0.025 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.0168 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.672(uM) | - | Substrate Grb2 Sos Product Sos.Grb2 |
| As there are 2 SH3 domains, this reaction could be 2nd order. I have a Kd of 22 uM from peptide binding (Lemmon et al JBC 269:50 pg 31653). However, Chook et al JBC 271:48 pg30472 say it is 0.4uM with purified proteins, so we believe them. They say it is 1:1 binding. Porfiri and McCormick JBC 271 also have related data. After comparing with the time-course of 1 min and the efficacy of activation of Ras, settle on Kd of 0.672 which is close to the Chook et al value. | |||||||
Sos acting as a Product in a reaction in MAPK-bistability-fig1c Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
| dephosph_Sos | -fig1c Accession No. : 35 | Sos Pathway No. : 180 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate Sos* Product Sos |
| The best clue I have to these rates is from the time courses of the EGF activation, which is around 1 to 5 min. The dephosph would be expected to be of the same order, perhaps a bit longer. Lets use 0.002 which is about 8 min. Sep 17: The transient activation curve matches better with kf = 0.001 | |||||||
color.