|
Enter a Search String | Special character and space not allowed in the query term.
Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for GAP | The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network. The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color. | Statistics | Accession and Pathway Details | |
Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 | 82 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, chain, kinetics, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[1], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[2], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[3], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[4], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[5], PKC, MAPK, Ras, kinetics[6], CaM, PKM, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[7], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[8], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[9], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[10], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[11], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[12], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[13], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[14], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[15], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[16], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[17], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[18], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[19], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[20], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[21], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[22], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[23], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM | This is a 25-compartment reaction-diffusion version of the Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM model. The original single-compartment model is repeated 25 times. In addition, a subset (27 out of 42) molecules can diffuse between compartments. Diffusion is implemented as a reaction between corresponding molecules in neighboring compartments. For D = 1e-12 m^2/sec (i.e., 1 micron^2/sec ) the kf and kb of this reaction for these 10 micron compartments are both 0.01/sec. For D = 1e-13 m^2/sec (i.e., 0.1 micron^2/sec ) the kf and kb are 0.001/sec.
The stimulus file pkm_mapk22_diff_1e-13_Fig4B which was used for the model to replicate Figure 4B from the paper.
pkm_mapk22_diff_1e-13_Fig4H replicate Figure 4H.
pkm_mapk22_diff_1e-13_Fig4I replicate Figure 4I.
|
GAP acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13 Network
Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc. (uM) | Volume (fL) | Buffered | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 529 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 536 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 542 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 548 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 554 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 560 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 566 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 572 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 578 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 584 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 590 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 596 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 602 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 608 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 614 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 620 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 626 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 632 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 638 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 644 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 650 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 656 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 662 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 668 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 674 | 0.01 | 1.5 | No | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. |
GAP acting as an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13 Network
| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | 1 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 529 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 2 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 536 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 3 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 542 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 4 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 548 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 5 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 554 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 6 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 560 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 7 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 566 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 8 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 572 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 9 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 578 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 10 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 584 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 11 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 590 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 12 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 596 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 13 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 602 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 14 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 608 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 15 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 614 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 16 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 620 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 17 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 626 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 18 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 632 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 19 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 638 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 20 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 644 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 21 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 650 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 22 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 656 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 23 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 662 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 24 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 668 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | 25 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 674 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
| | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
GAP acting as a Substrate for an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13 Network
GAP acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13 Network
Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated.
Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
GAP acting as a Product in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff1_1e-13 Network
Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated.
Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | 1 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 529 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 2 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 3 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 536 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 4 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 5 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 542 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 6 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 7 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 548 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 8 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 9 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 554 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 10 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 11 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 560 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 12 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 13 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 566 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 14 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 15 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 572 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 16 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 17 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 578 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 18 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 19 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 584 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 20 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 21 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 590 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 22 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 23 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 596 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 24 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 25 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 602 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 26 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 27 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 608 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 28 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 29 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 614 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 30 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 31 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 620 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 32 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 33 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 626 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 34 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 35 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 632 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 36 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 37 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 638 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 38 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 39 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 644 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 40 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 41 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 650 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 42 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 43 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 656 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 44 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 45 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 662 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 46 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 47 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 668 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | 48 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Pathway No. : 526 | 0.001 (s^-1) | 0.001 (s^-1) | Keq = 1(uM) | 500sec | Substrate GAP
Product GAP
| 49 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff1_ 1e-13 Accession No. : 82 | Ras Pathway No. : 674 | 0.1 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GAP*
Product GAP
| | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec |
| Database compilation and code copyright (C) 2022, Upinder S. Bhalla and NCBS/TIFR This Copyright is applied to ensure that the contents of this database remain freely available. Please see FAQ for details. |
|