|
Enter a Search String | | Special character and space not allowed in the query term.
Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for GAP | The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network.
The text color of a molecule is highlighted by  color. | | Statistics |
Accession and Pathway Details | |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2 | 83 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff, PKC, MAPK,
Ras, CaM, PKM, chain, kinetics, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[1],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, kinetics[3], CaM, PKM, kinetics[2], PKC, MAPK, Ras,
CaM, PKM, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[4], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM,
PKM, kinetics[5], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[6], PKC, MAPK,
Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[7], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[8],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[9], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[10],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[11], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[12],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[13], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[14],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[15], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[16],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[17], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[18],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[19], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[20],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[21], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[22],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[23], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[24],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[25], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[26],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[27], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[28],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[29], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[30],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[31], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[32],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[33], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[34],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[35], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[36],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[37], PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM, kinetics[38],
PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKM | This is a 40-compartment reaction-diffusion-transport version of the Ajay_Bhalla_2007_PKM model. The original single-compartment model is repeated 40 times. In addition, a subset (27 out of 42) molecules can diffuse between compartments. Diffusion is implemented as a reaction between corresponding molecules in neighboring compartments. For D = 1e-12 m^2/sec (i.e., 1 micron^2/sec ) the kf and kb of this reaction for these 10 micron compartments are both 0.01/sec In addition, we have a forward (dendrite to soma) transport term of 1 microns/sec. This converts to a rate of 0.1/sec, but applies only to the kf. So the total kf of the diffusion 'reaction' is 0.11 for D = 1 micron^2/sec, and kb is 0.01. If D=0.1 micron^2/sec then kf = 0.101 and kb = 0.001. In addition this model has all molecules buffered in the first and last compartments. This boundary conditions says that the molecules are not drained out of the first compartment, nor do they all pile up in the last one.
The stimulus file pkm_mapk22_transp_endbuf_D1e-13_Fig4CD which was used for the model to replicate Figure 4C and 4D from the paper.
|
GAP acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff2 Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc.
(uM) | Volume
(fL) | Buffered | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 687 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 693 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 700 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 705 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 711 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 717 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 723 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 729 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 735 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 741 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 747 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 753 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 759 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 765 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 771 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 777 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 783 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 789 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 795 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 801 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 807 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 813 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 819 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 825 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 831 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 837 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 843 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 849 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 855 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 861 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 867 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 873 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 879 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 885 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 891 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 897 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 903 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 909 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | No | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 680 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | Yes | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. | | GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 915 | 0.0063 | 1.5 | Yes | | GTPase-activating proteins. See Boguski and McCormick. Turn off Ras by helping to hydrolyze bound GTP. This one is probably NF1, ie., Neurofibromin as it is inhibited by AA and lipids, and expressed in neural cells. p120-GAP is also a possible candidate, but is less regulated. Both may exist at similar levels. See Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) pp27012-19 Level=.002 16 May 2003: Increased level to 0.0036, in line with other concentration raises at the synapse. |
GAP acting as an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff2 Network
| | Enzyme Molecule /
Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | | 1 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 680 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 2 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 687 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 3 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 693 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 4 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 700 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 5 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 705 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 6 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 711 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 7 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 717 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 8 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 723 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 9 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 729 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 10 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 735 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 11 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 741 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 12 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 747 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 13 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 753 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 14 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 759 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 15 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 765 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 16 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 771 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 17 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 777 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 18 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 783 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 19 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 789 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 20 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 795 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 21 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 801 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 22 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 807 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 23 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 813 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 24 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 819 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 25 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 825 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 26 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 831 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 27 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 837 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 28 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 843 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 29 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 849 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 30 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 855 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 31 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 861 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 32 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 867 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 33 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 873 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 34 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 879 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 35 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 885 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 36 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 891 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 37 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 897 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 38 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 903 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 39 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 909 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. | | 40 | GAP /
GAP-inact-ras
| Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 915 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GTP-Ras
Product
GDP-Ras
| | | From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
GAP acting as a Substrate for an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff2 Network
| | Enzyme Molecule /
Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | | 1 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 2 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics
Pathway No. : 684 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 3 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[1]
Pathway No. : 690 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 4 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[2]
Pathway No. : 697 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 5 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[3]
Pathway No. : 694 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 6 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[4]
Pathway No. : 708 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 7 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[5]
Pathway No. : 714 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 8 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[6]
Pathway No. : 720 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 9 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[7]
Pathway No. : 726 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 10 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[8]
Pathway No. : 732 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 11 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[9]
Pathway No. : 738 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 12 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[10]
Pathway No. : 744 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 13 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[11]
Pathway No. : 750 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 14 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[12]
Pathway No. : 756 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 15 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[13]
Pathway No. : 762 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 16 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[14]
Pathway No. : 768 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 17 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[31]
Pathway No. : 870 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 18 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[15]
Pathway No. : 774 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 19 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[16]
Pathway No. : 780 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 20 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[17]
Pathway No. : 786 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 21 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[18]
Pathway No. : 792 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 22 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[19]
Pathway No. : 798 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 23 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[20]
Pathway No. : 804 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 24 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[21]
Pathway No. : 810 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 25 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[22]
Pathway No. : 816 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 26 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[23]
Pathway No. : 822 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 27 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[24]
Pathway No. : 828 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 28 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[25]
Pathway No. : 834 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 29 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[26]
Pathway No. : 840 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 30 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[27]
Pathway No. : 846 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 31 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[28]
Pathway No. : 852 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 32 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[29]
Pathway No. : 858 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 33 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[30]
Pathway No. : 864 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 34 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[32]
Pathway No. : 876 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 35 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[33]
Pathway No. : 882 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 36 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[34]
Pathway No. : 888 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 37 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[35]
Pathway No. : 894 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 38 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[36]
Pathway No. : 900 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 39 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[37]
Pathway No. : 906 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. | | 40 | PKC-active /
PKC-inact-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | kinetics[38]
Pathway No. : 912 | 3.33333 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP*
| | | Rate consts copied from PCK-act-raf This reaction inactivates GAP. The idea is from the Boguski and McCormick review. |
GAP acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff2 Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated.
Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
GAP acting as a Product in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff2 Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated.
Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| | Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | | 1 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 680 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 2 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 3 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 687 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 4 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 5 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 693 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 6 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 7 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 700 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 8 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 9 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 705 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 10 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 11 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 711 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 12 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 13 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 717 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 14 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 15 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 723 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 16 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 17 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 729 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 18 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 19 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 735 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 20 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 21 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 741 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 22 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 23 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 747 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 24 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 25 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 753 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 26 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 27 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 759 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 28 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 29 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 765 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 30 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 31 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 771 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 32 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 33 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 777 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 34 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 35 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 783 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 36 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 37 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 789 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 38 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 39 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 795 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 40 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 41 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 801 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 42 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 43 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 807 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 44 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 45 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 813 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 46 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 47 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 819 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 48 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 49 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 825 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 50 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 51 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 831 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 52 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 53 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 837 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 54 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 55 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 843 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 56 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 57 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 849 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 58 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 59 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 855 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 60 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 61 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 861 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 62 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 63 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 867 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 64 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 65 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 873 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 66 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 67 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 879 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 68 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 69 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 885 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 70 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 71 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 891 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 72 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 73 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 897 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 74 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 75 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 903 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 76 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 77 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 909 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec | | 78 | diff | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff
Pathway No. : 677 | 0.101
(s^-1) | 0.001
(s^-1) | Keq = 0.0099(uM) | 9.804sec | Substrate
GAP
Product
GAP
| | 79 | dephosph-GAP | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff2
Accession No. : 83 | Ras
Pathway No. : 915 | 0.1
(s^-1) | 0
(s^-1) | - | - | Substrate
GAP*
Product
GAP
| | | Assume a reasonably good rate for dephosphorylating it, 1/sec |
| Database compilation and code copyright (C) 2022, Upinder S. Bhalla and NCBS/TIFR
This Copyright is applied to ensure that the contents of this database remain freely available. Please see FAQ for details. |
|
