Enter a Search String |
| Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule List for pathway Shared_Object_AMPAR_CaMKII_strong_coupling (Pathway Number 271)
| Name | Initial Conc. (uM) td> | Volume (fL) | Buffered | ||
| 1 | 286P-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 2 | actCaMKII-PSD | 2 | 0.01 | No | |
| 3 | act_CaMKII_cyt | 2 | 0.09 | No | |
| 4 | AMPAR_bulk | 0.0093 | 5 | Yes | |
| 5 | Anchor | 27.3333 | 0.01 | No | |
| 6 | basal_CaMKII_cyt | 2 | 0.09 | Yes | |
| 7 | basal_CaMKII_PSD | 2 | 0.01 | No | |
| 8 | basal_CaMKII_PSD_control | 2 | 0.01 | Yes | |
| 9 | Ca | 0.08 | 0.09 | No | |
| 10 | Ca-PSD | 0.08 | 0.01 | No | |
| 11 | CaM-Ca3 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 12 | CaM-Ca3-PSD | 0.0025 | 0.01 | No | |
| 13 | CaM-Ca4 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 14 | CaM-Ca4-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 15 | CaM-TR2-Ca2 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| This is the intermediate where the TR2 end (the high-affinity end) has bound the Ca but the TR1 end has not. | |||||
| 16 | CaM-TR2-Ca2-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| This is the intermediate where the TR2 end (the high-affinity end) has bound the Ca but the TR1 end has not. | |||||
| 17 | CaMKII***-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 18 | CaMKII-CaM-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 19 | CaMKII-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 20 | CaMKII-thr286-CaM-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 21 | CaMKII-thr286-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 22 | CaMKII-thr305-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 23 | cAMP | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| The conc of this has been a problem. Schaecter and Benowitz use 50 uM, but Shinomura et al have < 5. So I have altered the cAMP-dependent rates in the PKA model to reflect this. | |||||
| 24 | CaM_Ca_n-CaNAB | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 25 | CaNAB-Ca4 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 26 | Ca_control_cyt | 0.08 | 0.09 | Yes | |
| 27 | Ca_control_PSD | 0.08 | 0.01 | Yes | |
| 28 | I_845 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 29 | I_845-P | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 30 | I_845_PP | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 31 | NMDAR | 120 | 0.01 | No | |
| The stochiometry is a bit off here. Each NMDAR actually binds to a holoenzyme, about 12 CaMKII subunits. But our CaMKII calculations are in terms of individual subunits. So as a hack, we put in much more NMDAR than is actually there. | |||||
| 32 | PKA-active | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 33 | PKC-active | 0.1 | 0.09 | No | |
| 34 | PKC-control | 0.1 | 0.09 | Yes | |
| 35 | PP1-active | 1.8 | 0.09 | No | |
| Cohen et al Meth Enz 159 390-408 is main source of info conc = 1.8 uM | |||||
| 36 | PP1-active_PSD | 8 | 0.01 | No | |
| Cohen et al Meth Enz 159 390-408 is main source of info conc = 1.8 uM | |||||
| 37 | PP2A | 0.1111 | 0.09 | No | |
| 38 | Ser831 | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 39 | Ser831-P | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 40 | Ser831-PP | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 41 | Ser845 | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 42 | Ser845-P | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 43 | Ser845-PP | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 44 | temp-PIP2 | 2.5 | 0.09 | Yes | |
| This isn't explicitly present in the M&L model, but is obviously needed. I assume its conc is fixed at 1uM for now, which is a bit high. PLA2 is stim 7x by PIP2 @ 0.5 uM (Leslie and Channon BBA 1045:261(1990) Leslie and Channon say PIP2 is present at 0.1 - 0.2mol% range in membs, which comes to 50 nM. Ref is Majerus et al Cell 37 pp 701-703 1984 Lets use a lower level of 30 nM, same ref.... | |||||
| 45 | tot-auto-PSD | 2 | 0.01 | No | |
| 46 | tot-CaM-CaMKII-PSD | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
| 47 | total_Int | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 48 | tot_CaMKII_cyt | 22 | 0.09 | No | |
| 49 | tot_CaMKII_PSD | 2 | 0.01 | No | |
| 50 | tot_I_GluR12 | 0 | 0.09 | No | |
| 51 | tot_mem_GluR12 | 0 | 0.01 | No | |
Summed Molecule List
| Pathway Detail | Molecule List | Enzyme List | Reaction List |