|
Enter a Search String | | Special character and space not allowed in the query term.
Search string should be at least 2 characters long. |
Molecule Parameter List for craf-1 | The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network.
The text color of a molecule is highlighted by  color. | | Statistics |
Accession and Pathway Details | |
| Accession Name | Accession No. | Accession Type | Pathway Link | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3 | 84 | Network | Shared_Object_Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff3, PKC, PLA2,
MAPK, PLA2, Ras, CaM, chain, kinetics, PKC, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[1],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[2], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[3],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[4], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[5],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, MAPK, CaM, kinetics[6], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras,
CaM, kinetics[7], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, PKC, kinetics[8], PLA2,
MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[9], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[10],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[11], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM,
kinetics[12], PKC, PLA2, Ras, CaM, kinetics[13], PKC, PLA2, MAPK,
Ras, CaM, kinetics[14], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[15],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, kinetics[16], CaM, PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM,
kinetics[17], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[18], PKC, PLA2,
MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[19], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[20],
PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[21], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM,
kinetics[22], PKC, PLA2, MAPK, Ras, CaM, kinetics[23], PKC, PLA2,
MAPK, Ras, CaM | This is a 25-compartment reaction-diffusion version of the Ajay_Bhalla_2007_bistable model. The original single-compartment model is repeated 25 times.
In addition, a subset (33 out of 50) molecules can diffuse between compartments. Diffusion is implemented as a reaction between corresponding molecules in neighboring compartments. Here D = 1e-13 m^2/sec (i.e., 0.1 micron^2/sec ) so the kf and kb of this reaction for these 10 micron compartments are both 0.001/sec.
The basal calcium level in this model is held at 95 nM which is rather close to threshold for the flip to the active state. This is necessary to sustain active propagation of activation.
The stimulus file bis6-propgn_D1e-13_FigEF which was used for the model to replicate Figure 4E and 4F from the paper. |
craf-1 acting as a Molecule in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff3 Network
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Initial Conc.
(uM) | Volume
(fL) | Buffered | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 921 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 928 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 940 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 934 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 946 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 952 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 958 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 960 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 965 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 971 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 977 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 983 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 989 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 995 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1006 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1012 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1018 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1024 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1030 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1036 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1042 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1048 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1054 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1060 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 | | craf-1 | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | MAPK
Pathway No. : 1066 | 0.5 | 125.7 | No | | Couldn't find any ref to the actual conc of craf-1 but I should try Strom et al Oncogene 5 pp 345 In line with the other kinases in the cascade, I estimate the conc to be 0.2 uM. To init we use 0.15, which is close to equil 16 May 2003: Changing to synaptic levels. Increasing 2.5 fold to 0.5 uM. See Mihaly et al 1991 Brain Res 547(2):309-14 and Morice et al 1999 Eur J Neurosci 11(6):1995-2006 |
craf-1 acting as a Substrate for an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff3 Network
| | Enzyme Molecule /
Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents | | 1 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Pathway No. : 918 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 2 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics
Pathway No. : 926 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 3 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[1]
Pathway No. : 931 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 4 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[2]
Pathway No. : 937 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 5 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[3]
Pathway No. : 943 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 6 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[4]
Pathway No. : 949 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 7 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[5]
Pathway No. : 955 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 8 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[6]
Pathway No. : 962 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 9 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[7]
Pathway No. : 968 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 10 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[8]
Pathway No. : 975 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 11 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[9]
Pathway No. : 980 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 12 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[10]
Pathway No. : 986 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 13 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[11]
Pathway No. : 992 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 14 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[12]
Pathway No. : 998 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 15 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[13]
Pathway No. : 1003 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 16 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[14]
Pathway No. : 1009 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 17 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[15]
Pathway No. : 1015 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 18 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[16]
Pathway No. : 1020 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 19 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[17]
Pathway No. : 1027 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 20 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[18]
Pathway No. : 1033 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 21 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[19]
Pathway No. : 1039 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 22 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[20]
Pathway No. : 1045 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 23 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[21]
Pathway No. : 1051 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 24 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[22]
Pathway No. : 1057 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC | | 25 | PKC-active /
PKC-act-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[23]
Pathway No. : 1063 | 66.6665 | 4 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate
craf-1
Product
craf-1*
| | | Rate consts from Chen et al Biochem 32, 1032 (1993) k3 = k2 = 4 k1 = 9e-5 recalculated gives 1.666e-5, which is not very different. Looks like k3 is rate-limiting in this case: there is a huge amount of craf locked up in the enz complex. Let us assume a 10x higher Km, ie, lower affinity. k1 drops by 10x. Also changed k2 to 4x k3. Lowerd k1 to 1e-6 to balance 10X DAG sensitivity of PKC |
craf-1 acting as a Product of an Enzyme in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff3 Network
craf-1 acting as a Substrate in a reaction in Ajay_Bhalla_2007_ReacDiff3 Network
| Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated.
Kd for higher order reaction are not consider. |
| | Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents | | 1 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | Shared_Object_
Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Pathway No. : 918 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 2 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics
Pathway No. : 926 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 3 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[1]
Pathway No. : 931 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 4 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[2]
Pathway No. : 937 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 5 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[3]
Pathway No. : 943 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 6 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[4]
Pathway No. : 949 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 7 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[5]
Pathway No. : 955 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 8 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[6]
Pathway No. : 962 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 9 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[7]
Pathway No. : 968 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 10 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[8]
Pathway No. : 975 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 11 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[9]
Pathway No. : 980 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 12 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[10]
Pathway No. : 986 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 13 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[11]
Pathway No. : 992 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 14 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[12]
Pathway No. : 998 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 15 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[13]
Pathway No. : 1003 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 16 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[14]
Pathway No. : 1009 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 17 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[15]
Pathway No. : 1015 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 18 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[16]
Pathway No. : 1020 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 19 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[17]
Pathway No. : 1027 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 20 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[18]
Pathway No. : 1033 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 21 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[19]
Pathway No. : 1039 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 22 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[20]
Pathway No. : 1045 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 23 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[21]
Pathway No. : 1051 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 24 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[22]
Pathway No. : 1057 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. | | 25 | Ras-act-unphosph
-raf | Ajay_Bhalla_
2007_ReacDiff3
Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[23]
Pathway No. : 1063 | 6
(uM^-1 s^-1) | 1
(s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate
GTP-Ras
craf-1
Product
Raf-GTP-Ras
| | | 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
| Database compilation and code copyright (C) 2022, Upinder S. Bhalla and NCBS/TIFR
This Copyright is applied to ensure that the contents of this database remain freely available. Please see FAQ for details. |
|
