Taken from Kholodenko et al 1999 Simulations were done at EGF concentration set to 20nM and 2nM concentration. This concentration was multiplied by a constant factor Vm/Vcw = 33.3 to formally rescale it to the cytoplasmic water volume. So actual concentration to which EGF was set was 666nM and 66.6nM. Plots 1&3 of figure-5 and plot 1 of figure 4 are obtained by setting the EGF conc to 666nM. Plots 2&4 of figure-5 and plot 3 of figure 4 are obtained by setting the EGF conc to 66.6nM.
Taken from Kholodenko BN et al J Biol Chem. (1999) 274(42):30169-81. To obtain plots as per figure-4 and 5 [Grb] is set to 51.954nM. instead of 85nM. Thanks to Dr. Boris N. Kholodenko for clarifying the ambiguity and furnishing us the above value. To obtain plots as per figure-7A [Grb] is set to 340nM (4-fold increase).
The initial concentration is set to 0.95421nM instead of 37nM which. Thanks to Dr. Boris N. Kholodenko for clarifying the ambiguity and furnishing the initial concentration.
Database compilation and code copyright (C) 2022, Upinder S. Bhalla and NCBS/TIFR This Copyright is applied to ensure that the contents of this database remain freely available. Please see FAQ for details.