| Enzyme Molecule / Enzyme Activity | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Km (uM) | kcat (s^-1) | Ratio | Enzyme Type | Reagents |
1 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 923 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
2 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 929 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
3 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 935 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
4 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 941 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
5 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 947 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
6 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 953 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
7 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 959 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
8 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 966 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
9 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 972 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
10 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 978 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
11 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 984 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
12 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 990 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
13 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 996 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
14 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1001 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
15 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1007 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
16 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1013 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
17 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1019 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
18 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1025 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
19 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1031 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
20 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1037 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
21 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1043 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
22 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1049 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
23 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1055 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
24 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1061 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
25 | GAP / GAP-inact-ras | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1067 | 1.0104 | 10 | 4 | explicit E-S complex | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| From Eccleston et al JBC 268(36)pp27012-19 get Kd < 2uM, kcat - 10/sec From Martin et al Cell 63 843-849 1990 get Kd ~ 250 nM, kcat = 20/min I will go with the Eccleston figures as there are good error bars (10%). In general the values are reasonably close. k1 = 1.666e-3/sec, k2 = 1000/sec, k3 = 10/sec (note k3 is rate-limiting) 5 Nov 2002: Changed ratio term to 4 from 100. Now we have k1=8.25e-5; k2=40, k3=10. k3 is still rate-limiting. |
| Name | Accession Name | Pathway Name | Kf | Kb | Kd | tau | Reagents |
1 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Pathway No. : 918 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
2 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 923 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
3 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Shared_Object_ Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Pathway No. : 918 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
4 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics Pathway No. : 926 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
5 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 929 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
6 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics Pathway No. : 926 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
7 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[1] Pathway No. : 931 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
8 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 935 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
9 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[1] Pathway No. : 931 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
10 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[2] Pathway No. : 937 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
11 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 941 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
12 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[2] Pathway No. : 937 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
13 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[3] Pathway No. : 943 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
14 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 947 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
15 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[3] Pathway No. : 943 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
16 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[4] Pathway No. : 949 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
17 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 953 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
18 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[4] Pathway No. : 949 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
19 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[5] Pathway No. : 955 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
20 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 959 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
21 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[5] Pathway No. : 955 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
22 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[6] Pathway No. : 962 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
23 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 966 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
24 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[6] Pathway No. : 962 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
25 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[7] Pathway No. : 968 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
26 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 972 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
27 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[7] Pathway No. : 968 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
28 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[8] Pathway No. : 975 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
29 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 978 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
30 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[8] Pathway No. : 975 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
31 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[9] Pathway No. : 980 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
32 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 984 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
33 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[9] Pathway No. : 980 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
34 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[10] Pathway No. : 986 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
35 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 990 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
36 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[10] Pathway No. : 986 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
37 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[11] Pathway No. : 992 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
38 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 996 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
39 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[11] Pathway No. : 992 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
40 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[12] Pathway No. : 998 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
41 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1001 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
42 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[12] Pathway No. : 998 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
43 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[13] Pathway No. : 1003 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
44 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1007 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
45 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[13] Pathway No. : 1003 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
46 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[14] Pathway No. : 1009 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
47 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1013 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
48 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[14] Pathway No. : 1009 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
49 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[15] Pathway No. : 1015 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
50 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1019 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
51 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[15] Pathway No. : 1015 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
52 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[16] Pathway No. : 1020 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
53 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1025 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
54 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[16] Pathway No. : 1020 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
55 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[17] Pathway No. : 1027 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
56 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1031 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
57 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[17] Pathway No. : 1027 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
58 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[18] Pathway No. : 1033 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
59 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1037 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
60 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[18] Pathway No. : 1033 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
61 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[19] Pathway No. : 1039 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
62 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1043 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
63 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[19] Pathway No. : 1039 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
64 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[20] Pathway No. : 1045 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
65 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1049 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
66 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[20] Pathway No. : 1045 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
67 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[21] Pathway No. : 1051 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
68 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1055 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
69 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[21] Pathway No. : 1051 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
70 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[22] Pathway No. : 1057 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
71 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1061 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
72 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[22] Pathway No. : 1057 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |
73 | Ras-act-craf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[23] Pathway No. : 1063 | 9.9998 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 0.5 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.05(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1*
Product Raf*-GTP-Ras
|
| Assume the binding is fast and limited only by the amount of Ras* available. So kf=kb/[craf-1] If kb is 1/sec, then kf = 1/0.2 uM = 1/(0.2 * 6e5) = 8.3e-6 Later: Raise it by 10 X to 4e-5 From Hallberg et al JBC 269:6 3913-3916 1994, 3% of cellular Raf is complexed with Ras. So we raise kb 4x to 4 This step needed to memb-anchor and activate Raf: Leevers et al Nature 369 411-414 May 16, 2003 Changed Ras and Raf to synaptic levels, an increase of about 2x for each. To maintain the percentage of complexed Raf, reduced the kf by 2.4 fold to 10. |
74 | Ras-intrinsic-GT Pase | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | Ras Pathway No. : 1067 | 0.0001 (s^-1) | 0 (s^-1) | - | - | Substrate GTP-Ras
Product GDP-Ras
|
| This is extremely slow (1e-4), but it is significant as so little GAP actually gets complexed with it that the total GTP turnover rises only by 2-3 X (see Gibbs et al, JBC 265(33) 20437-20422) and Eccleston et al JBC 268(36) 27012-27019 kf = 1e-4 |
75 | Ras-act-unphosph -raf | Ajay_Bhalla_ 2007_ReacDiff3 Accession No. : 84 | kinetics[23] Pathway No. : 1063 | 6 (uM^-1 s^-1) | 1 (s^-1) | Kd(bf) = 0.1667(uM) | - | Substrate GTP-Ras craf-1
Product Raf-GTP-Ras
|
| 18 May 2003. This reaction is here to provide basal activity for MAPK as well as the potential for direct EGF stimulus without PKC activation. Based on model from FB/fb28c.g: the model used for MKP-1 turnover. The rates there were constrained by basal activity values. |