NCBS Home page
Accession List
Pathway List
Search
Authorized Users
Help
News archives

Enter a Search String

Special character and space not allowed in the query term. Search string should be at least 2 characters long.
Search in: Search for Match By

Molecule Parameter List for Sos

The statistics table lists the distribution of a molecule acting either as a substrate, product, enzyme or as a molecule within the network.
The text color of a molecule is highlighted by color.
Statistics
Sos participated asMoleculeSum total ofEnzymeSubstrate of an enzymeProduct of an enzymeSubstrate in ReactionProduct in Reaction
No. of occurrences1000011

Accession and Pathway Details
Accession NameAccession No.Accession TypePathway Link
  • mkp1_feedback_
    effects
  • 4Network
    Shared_Object_mkp1_feedback_effects Sos PKC 
    MAPK PLA2 Ras 
    PDGFR 
    This is a network involving the MAPK-PKC feedback loop with input from the PDGFR in the synapse. The distinctive feature of this model is that it includes MKP-1 induction by MAPK, and the consequent inhibitory regulation of MAPK and the feedback loop. Lots of interesting dynamics arise from this. This link provides supplementary material for the paper Bhalla US et al. Science (2002) 297(5583):1018-23. In the form of several example simulations and demos for the figures in the paper.

    Sos acting as a Molecule in  
    mkp1_feedback_effects Network
    NameAccession NamePathway NameInitial Conc.
    (uM)
    Volume
    (fL)
    Buffered
    Sos
  • mkp1_feedback_
    effects

    Accession No. : 4
  • Sos
    Pathway No. : 33
    0.11000No
    I have tried using low (0.02 uM) initial concs, but these give a very flat response to EGF stim although the overall activation of Ras is not too bad. I am reverting to 0.1 because we expect a sharp initial response, followed by a decline.

    Sos acting as a Substrate in a reaction in  
    mkp1_feedback_effects Network
    Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider.
    NameAccession NamePathway NameKfKbKdtauReagents
    Grb2_bind_Sos
  • mkp1_feedback_
    effects

    Accession No. : 4
  • Sos
    Pathway No. : 33
    0.025
    (uM^-1 s^-1)
    0.0168
    (s^-1)
    Kd(bf) = 0.672(uM)-Substrate
    Grb2
    Sos

    Product
    Sos.Grb2
    As there are 2 SH3 domains, this reaction could be 2nd order. I have a Kd of 22 uM from peptide binding (Lemmon et al JBC 269:50 pg 31653). However, Chook et al JBC 271:48 pg30472 say it is 0.4uM with purified proteins, so we believe them. They say it is 1:1 binding. Porfiri and McCormick JBC 271 also have related data. After comparing with the time-course of 1 min and the efficacy of activation of Ras, settle on Kd of 0.672 which is close to the Chook et al value.

    Sos acting as a Product in a reaction in  
    mkp1_feedback_effects Network
    Kd is calculated only for second order reactions, like nA+nB <->nC or nA<->nC+nD, where n is number and A,B,C,D are molecules, where as for first order reactions Keq is calculated. Kd for higher order reaction are not consider.
    NameAccession NamePathway NameKfKbKdtauReagents
    dephosph_Sos
  • mkp1_feedback_
    effects

    Accession No. : 4
  • Sos
    Pathway No. : 33
    0.001
    (s^-1)
    0
    (s^-1)
    --Substrate
    Sos*

    Product
    Sos
    The best clue I have to these rates is from the time courses of the EGF activation, which is around 1 to 5 min. The dephosph would be expected to be of the same order, perhaps a bit longer. Lets use 0.002 which is about 8 min. Sep 17: The transient activation curve matches better with kf = 0.001



    Database compilation and code copyright (C) 2022, Upinder S. Bhalla and NCBS/TIFR
    This Copyright is applied to ensure that the contents of this database remain freely available. Please see FAQ for details.